Ktk2YLeUKebUC6fKBM+YvSW1b2YSERJwkbKiD+2F1Nc5UyRs6v X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/SPBJQinHX94j0qtDaHOJUZB38JI5NNAAl4Ic Thread-Index: AcppU1OkA2KRPgLKRqWWeNYMDLOrpwD+U21Q Received: from xxxxxx (.net )īy (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) The header of the original message is following. When reading the information at Spamhaus, I said OK, sounds like I need to use a server. Recipient address: Reason: SMTP transmission failure has occurredĭiagnostic code: smtp 554 Service unavailable Client host blocked by Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: This seemed to work, but today when sending to the same recipient, I got the following bounce: This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: So I set my outgoing server to, with appropriate credentials (I do have a e-mail address, I just don't use it). Now first of all, I find it unacceptable that I need to use Verizon's outgoing mail servers rather than the provider of my choice. That's just bizzare!īut now it seems that Verizon is also not even keeping its own data straight with spamhaus!Ĭan anyone shed any light on this? Is there anything I can do to resolve these problems? This means that if I have someone over who wants to connect their laptop to our network to send e-mail, they have to reconfigure their e-mail, and I have to give them my credentials, or else create an account for them on. I may not have been clear: Spamhaus isn't treating my IP as a blacklisted IP - it is reporting it as a violation of the Policy Block List, stating that I must use Verizon's servers - even though, as you can see in the second example, I WAS using a Verizon server. Spamhaus explicitly states that there is no option to contest this (check it for yourself - the masked address in my OP gets the same message).įurthermore, however, I would like to protest this policy: it is unacceptable, and in my oppinion a violation of Network Neutrality, to require me to change my email configuration in order to send e-mail via my FiOS connection. If I was a simple user, with a single desktop PC at home, this wouldn't be a problem. From other posts I've seen, it seems that this will require me to change my outgoing server configuration each time I travel.I have visitors who bring their own computers at times.They shouldn't have to change their e-mail configuration in order to send e-mail via my connection. Furthermore, if my visitor's e-mail address is on a domain with SPF (Sender Policy Framework), this may cause the messages to be refused due to SPF violations.My primary e-mail address is on my own domain, with service provided by a hosting provider (I am NOT running my own e-mail server).I would also like to mention that I haven't been able to figure out a way to submit this complaint directly to Verizon - the Contact Us page doesn't seem to work with IE, and with FireFox it just sent me around in wrote: So now my SPF record for the domain needs to include as a valid sending domain. I just thought of something: should the receiving server, which is rejecting the e-mail, be checking the IP of the originating client, or only the IP of the originating mail server? Because if so, then it is simply my recipient who has a problem, not Verizon. I'm sorry, I guess I didn't make myself clear before. What you are saying is what I was trying to tell you was the problem. Spmahaus is rejecting your email at the recipient end because the receiving server is using spamhaus to enforce a no relaying policy which may indicate spamming. Relaying is defined as email that is originating at an ip address that is not part of the network associated with the smtp server from which the mail is ostensibly originating. As such some of your mail will reach your recipients and some won't. It's nothing that VZ requested or can do anything about.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |